有什么能用的V P N

July 31, 2020

老王灯笼官方下载

This Washington Post story, about the Postal Service intentionally slowing down mail sorting and delivery, may explain why the mortgage statement that my lender sent from Utah on July 15 arrived at my house on July 28.

July 31, 2020 at 09:08 AM in 45, Business, Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0)

June 19, 2020

For Juneteenth this year, Lift Every Voice and Sing

How can an American not hear without national pride the ascending melody and stirring words, "O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave," with which each verse closes? If your great-grandparents were slaves in the "land of the free," you may hear those words differently. Although The Star-Spangled Banner did not become our national anthem until 1931, Francis Scott Key wrote his stirring words about "the land of the free and the home of the brave" in 1814, when slavery was yet part of our nation. Key owned slaves himself, black people who were in the land of the free but not free themselves.

Key alluded to slaves, without irony, in the third verse, which only pedants know. I'll quote it in its entirety:

And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion,
A home and a country should leave us no more!
Their blood has washed out their foul footsteps' pollution.
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave:
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

Who are the "hirelings and slaves" of Key's verse? According to Robin Blackburn, a British socialist historian, the slaves of Key's verse are American slaves. The British army had freed the American slaves that it encountered, some of whom joined the British army to do battle with the nation that had enslaved them. Key's verses about "the land of the free" ignored the unfree in America, and mocked those that sought the same freedoms that Key himself, as a white slaveowner, enjoyed.

Every American should know Yankee Doodle, the most prominent song of our nation's independence. Every American should know the first verse of The Star-Spangled Banner and the coldly ironic story behind the other verses. There's a third patriotic song that every American should know. It's called 老王灯笼官方下载. 老王 2.2.8 (1871-1938) wrote the words in 1899 and his brother John Rosamond Johnson (1873-1954) set it to music in 1905. It begins with these three lines:

Lift every voice and sing,
'Til earth and heaven ring,
Ring with the harmonies of Liberty;

Unlike the invocation of immediate peril in La Marseillaise, or the florid description of the battle in The Star-Spangled Banner, James Johnson's verse alludes only subtly to the slavery era:

Stony the road we trod,
Bitter the chast'ning rod,
Felt in the days when hope unborn had died;
Yet with a steady beat,
Have not our weary feet
Come to the place for which our fathers sighed?

The college classmate from whom 老王免费灯笼2.2.4 many years ago said it was the black national anthem, and in fact the NAACP had 老王的灯笼v2.2.9 in 1919. As an anthem it's a remarkable statement of hope. It's nearly as remarkable for what it doesn't say: it doesn't wish destruction on anyone, and it doesn't, unlike Key's song, celebrate freedoms that more than half of Key's compatriots couldn't enjoy.

Juneteenth is a fine day to celebrate the end of slavery and to remember what Francis Scott Key was too oblivious to see.

June 19, 2020 at 08:37 AM in American History, Music | Permalink | Comments (0)

June 18, 2020

A federal judge says it's "madness" to remove Confederate names from bases because there were good people on both sides. A brave clerk puts him in his place

做灯笼PPT课件2下载_做灯笼PPT课件2免费下载「PPT课件」 ...:做灯笼PPT课件2是PPT课件下一个非常热门的PPT模板，太平洋下载中心提供做灯笼PPT课件2免费下载。和平精英电脑版王者荣耀电脑版我的世界电脑版 ...

Ten military bases in the United States are named after Confederate officers -- the only instances I'm aware of in which the United States has named military bases after officers of a defeated military opponent, no matter how illustrious. Our military does not drill at Camp Cornwallis or Fort Rommel.

Senator Elizabeth Warren has introduced legislation to require the military to rename those bases after people who did not rebel against the United States. Judge Silberman disapproves.

On June 14, Judge Silberman wrote to the judges and judicial clerks in the circuit and described as "madness" Senator Warren's proposal to rename the bases after soldiers who did not fight against the United States. He described her proposal, which involved no graveyards, as "the desecration of Confederate graves." He continued, "It's important to remember that Lincoln did not fight the war to free the slaves. Indeed, he was willing to put up with slavery if the Confederate states returned." (I've corrected Judge Silberman's errors of capitalization and punctuation.) He pointed to his own family history as a reason to commemorate both sides of the Civil War: the judge's great-grandfather fought for the Union and the great-grandfather's brother fought for the Confederacy.

One day later a judicial clerk became the first to answer Judge Silberman. Here are some excerpts from the brave law clerk's response:

I am only one of five black law clerks in this entire circuit. Since no one in the court's leadership has responded to your message, I thought I would give it a try. * * * [M]y maternal ancestors were enslaved in Mississippi. While the laws of this nation viewed my ancestors as property, I view them as hostages. In a hostage situation, when someone does something that leads to the freeing of the hostages, I am not sure if the hostages would be concerned as to whether the person that saved them, actually intended to save them. My ancestors would not have been involved in the philosophical and political debates about Lincoln’s true intentions.

It is very clear what the Confederacy stood for. In 1861, at the Virginia secession convention, Henry L. Benning (for whom Fort Benning is named) in explaining the reasoning for Georgia’s decision to secede from the United States stated, “[it] was a conviction … that a separation from the North was the only thing that could prevent the abolition of her slavery…[I]t is probable that the white race, being superior in every respect, may push the other back.” Unfortunately, in this scenario, no matter how bravely your uncle fought for the Confederacy, the foundation of his fight was a decision that he agreed more with the ideals of the Confederacy, than he did with those of the Union. And in the end, he chose the losing side of history.

Finally, I will note that the current movement to rename Government owned facilities is in line with your previous opinions on the importance of names and what they represent. In 2005, you publicly advocated for the removal of J. Edgar Hoover’s name from the FBI Building due to the problematic material you came across in your review of his FBI files after his death. You equated it to the Defense Department being named for Aaron Burr. * * * It is very strange that you would be against renaming our military facilities, since the legacy of the Confederacy represents the same thing.

Thanks to The Intercept for reporting this story.

June 18, 2020 at 06:00 PM in American History, Law, Courts, and Cases | Permalink | Comments (0)

老王2.2.0

内蒙古托县辣椒面-淘宝拼多多热销内蒙古托县辣椒面货源拿货 ...:￥ 4.2 30~ 件经销批发 16.64 0人付款天猫内蒙古油泼辣子托县辣椒面灯笼红辣椒粉香而不辣烧烤上色辣240g ... 味勋旗舰店同款货源 32.00 6人付款淘宝内蒙古托县灯笼红干辣椒香而不辣农家油泼辣子粉面调 …

An alert reader of the Tampa Bay Times observes in a June 7 letter to the editor (the sixth one down, here) that President Trump may want to move the 2020 Republican National Convention from North Carolina not just because he's in a spat with North Carolina's governor, a Democrat, but also to benefit his hotels. The ones in the District of Columbia and Chicago wouldn't do, as they're both in Democratic strongholds. How about the Trump National Doral, near Miami? True, the Miami convention center is 14 miles away from the Doral and 75 miles from the winter White House at Mar-A-Lago. A fleet of buses can solve the first problem, and the second one should be no trouble for a man who commands a fleet of helicopters.

June 07, 2020 at 01:53 PM in 45, National Politics | Permalink | Comments (0)

May 21, 2020

Now that Metro has $250 million/year to end homelessness, how will we know if it succeeds? Isaac has some recommendations

One recurring criticism of Metro's income tax to aid the homeless, which the voters approved yesterday, is that it comes without any clear plan for how it will use the $250 million/year that the tax will raise to assist the roughly 2,000 chronically homeless people in the metropolitan area or the roughly 38,000 people who are not chronically homeless, but are without a home for some part of the year.

How much is $250 million/year compared to other government budgets? Portland Public Schools, the largest school district in Oregon, spends about老王2.2.0 and employs 4,100 people to educate 50,000 children. The City of Eugene, Oregon's second-largest (population 171,000), spends about $580 million/year, of which about $180 million is through its general fund. Metro's operating budget (excluding capital investments through its Natural Areas bond fund, its $650 million Affordable Housing bond fund from 2018, and other bonded funds, is about $500 million/year. The new income tax equals about half of Metro's current operating budget. It represents a major expansion of Metro's responsibilities.

How, then, shall Metro evaluate whether it's using these new tax dollars wisely? And how shall the public evaluate Metro's use of this torrent of involuntary largesse? (I say "involuntary largesse" because about 85% of the voters earn less than the minimum required to pay the tax.) I'd like to propose that before Metro signs even one contract with a social service agency, a well-spirited nonprofit, or a politically connected consultant, it must establish quantitative performance measures and require each prospective contractee to commit to how it will help Metro meet those measures.

I have a few performance measures to suggest:

Assist at least X people/year who are homeless by emergency (e.g., domestic violence, foreclosure, eviction) to be sheltered within 48 hours, and then assist them to be housed within 14 days after being sheltered
Reduce the number of people who are sidewalk-homeless for 7 days or more to zero
Convert at least X people/year from tent-homeless to sheltered
Provide effective inpatient treatment for drug addiction to at least X homeless people/year
Transition at least 75% of the people they serve to be housed and free of addictions within one year of receiving their first service

How will we know if this measure has accomplished its purpose?

No one will be camping on downtown Portland sidewalks because the program funds are providing shelter. (Several court decisions have held that cities can't criminalize sleeping outside if no shelter spaces are available. Ergo: make shelter spaces available.)
There will be no tent cities along the Springwater Trail. (See previous metric.)
The open-air drug markets will have disappeared.
Our parks won't be needle dumps.
Several thousand people a year will have moved from street to shelter and from shelter to housing.

冰箱APP官方版下载V3.12.2-冰箱手机版下载|冰箱安卓版 ...:2021-6-8 · 冰箱APP官方版下载V3.12.2- 把恶意软件全冻住软件介绍: 应用太耗电？不如「冻」起来。冰箱 Ice Box，是禁止应用中最受欢迎，下载量最多的冻结 App，没有之一。为什么？因为五年如一日，冰箱只做「冻结」一件事 ...

May 21, 2020 at 05:30 PM in Current Affairs, Law, Courts, and Cases, The City Center | Permalink | Comments (0)

老王灯笼APP

The Laquedem Coronavirus Relief Plan for cruise lines: out of site, out of mind

That's not a typo. One of the good points of the CARES Act, which provides relief for small businesses across the country, is that to qualify, a business must be "created or organized in the United States or under the laws of the United States," and it must have "significant operations in and a majority of its employees based in the United States." The CARES Act intentionally omits the major cruise lines from its benefits. Congress should hold firm against the pleas of the cruise industry for a bailout. Here's why.

Consider Carnival Cruise Lines, the most American of the major lines. It consists of two entities, both publicly traded. The United States entity, Carnival Corporation, has its corporate offices and operational headquarters in Florida. It is, however, a Panama corporation, though its Seabourn and Holland America brands operate through American subsidiaries from a Seattle office, and its Princess Cruises brand operates from California.

内蒙古托县辣椒面-淘宝拼多多热销内蒙古托县辣椒面货源拿货 ...:￥ 4.2 30~ 件经销批发 16.64 0人付款天猫内蒙古油泼辣子托县辣椒面灯笼红辣椒粉香而不辣烧烤上色辣240g ... 味勋旗舰店同款货源 32.00 6人付款淘宝内蒙古托县灯笼红干辣椒香而不辣农家油泼辣子粉面调 …

Carnival's management has chosen to register its ships in foreign countries and not site them in the United States for two main reasons: to avoid American income taxes and to avoid American wage and safety regulations. I would be disappointed if Congress gave in to the industry's pleas for help. I'd applaud any member of Congress who will tell the cruise line owners to look for relief for their foreign ships from Panama, Malta, and Bahamas, the nations they chose to support.

April 17, 2020 at 08:55 AM in Business, COVID-19, Travel | Permalink | 老王灯笼APP

老王2.2.0

红灯笼婚礼企划电话,地址,价格(图)-上海-大众点评网 - Dianping:2021-4-1 · 红灯笼婚礼企划:淞宝路86-1号(牡丹江路宝杨路),红灯笼婚礼企划回复这位先生您好，请问您是什么时间到店咨询的？是哪位接待的您，我们公司将针对您的点评做公司内部排查，情况属实我们将严肃处理，也感谢您可以给我们更多的信息让我们能可以更好的提升服务。

The federal and state courts in Washington must have been surprised to receive a notice of unavailability this week, not from lawyers in a case but from UW Medicine, the hospital system affiliated with the University of Washington. The notice states that because of the COVID-19 pandemic, until at least April 27 all medical professionals employed by UW Medicine will be unavailable to participate in any regularly-scheduled legal proceeding. In a polite way, UW Medicine has told the legal system that it's going to put treating patients and keeping its staff healthy above going through old files, sitting in depositions, and showing up for hearings.

Most of the judges and lawyers of our sister state will agree that UW Medicine is in line with our national priorities. I predict, however, that at least one tone-deaf attorney will file a motion to compel someone from UW Medicine to attend some legal proceeding, and I hope the court that hears the blithe lawyer's motion orders him or her into quarantine.

You can read the full text of UW Medicine's letter to the courts below the break. UW was thorough and also sent its notice to the state and local bar associations, the attorney general, the King County prosecuting attorney, and the public defender.

Continue reading "UW Medicine tells the courts to go away until COVID-19 is under control" »

March 27, 2020 at 08:24 AM in COVID-19, Health Care, Law, Courts, and Cases, Our Friends Up North | Permalink | Comments (0)

March 26, 2020

Jane Ace tells off a hospital that asked for a gift

On March 9 the Wall Street Journal published this article by Alexandra Samuel about feedback fatigue, describing how "in their eagerness to deliver a better customer experience" by incessantly asking for reviews and evaluations, "companies have created a new kind of bad customer experience: feedback fatigue." Ms. Samuel cites two studies that discovered that customers don't like the surveys. "Repeated surveys," she wrote, "may make customers reluctant to return." She described a 2014 study as showing that "over-surveying by different organizations leads to exhaustion with all the requests for feedback."

The article brought to mind one fine example of a business being less than careful with its customer outreach, way back in 1974. The particular business was a New York City hospital, and it sent this letter to a former patient, Jane Ace. I've shortened it a bit:

December 6, 1974

Dear Mrs. Ace:

As a recent patient you have seen how our hospital serves its community by providing a full range of medical services, offering a high level of nursing service together with physical amenities, enabling the hospital to treat the patient as a person, rather than a number. We are appealing to former patients like yourself to contribute to the hospital's Capital Improvement Fund . . .

[Signed by the president of the hospital]

Mrs. Ace and her husband Goodman Ace were well-known radio personalities, and he was a veteran humorist. He felt that the letter wasn't appropriate, and wrote the following response, which has stuck with me since I first read it in 1975:

December 8, 1974

Dear Sir:

As a former patient I did notice your high-level nursing service together with its other amenities, and I would dearly like to contribute to your hospital fund. But, you see, on November 11 I died in your hospital. Maybe we can get together later.

Sincerely, Jane Ace

March 26, 2020 at 08:48 PM in Business, Genial old codgers, Health Care, Whimsy | Permalink | Comments (0)

March 22, 2020

The Laquedem coronavirus relief plan, part 2: the Airline Relief Plan

My previous post tackled student loan relief. I'm ready to start on the airline industry's pleas for money.

The United States airline industry has been making the rounds on Capitol Hill, attempting to persuade legislators that it is so essential to the American economy that Congress should give it a priority position (early boarding?) when Congress hands out relief to businesses. Certainly the airline industry is important to our economy, but that doesn't mean that any particular airline is itself important. The planes, airports, and other infrastructure aren't going anywhere, even if their proprietors go broke.

Several commentators have pointed out that the major airlines would have been better able to weather the COVID-19 depression if they had used the profits of the past five years to pay down debt instead of buying back stock. The major airlines spent billions of dollars buying back their companies' stock over the past five years, money that's no longer in their tills to get through downturns. How much stock did they buy back? Since March 2015 United bought back at least 134 million shares, reducing its outstanding shares by 35%. American bought back at least 265 million shares, reducing its share count by nearly 40%. American was so confident about its business prospects that even in 2020 it's bought back 2 million shares so far.

The airlines profess that they are repenting of their sins. The leaders of ten major passenger and freight airlines (including UPS and FedEx) have 老王2.2.3 that if Congress will grant them $29 billion in aid, they will not lay off any employees until at least August 31, they will not buy back any stock or pay any dividends until they've repaid the aid, and they will limit executive compensation in some unspecified manner. They want the aid in the form of loans, not equity investment. 老王 2.2.8 a link to their letter.

I have a certain sympathy for the predicament in which the airline companies find themselves. At the same time, it's time for them to eat some of their own financial cooking. They've gotten away with serving "airline food" for years. It's time for them to eat their own cooking. Hence the Laquedem Airline Relief Plan.

The first element is that the United States will provide the $29 billion in aid, but with a few financial twists:

1. The United States will provide the aid, not as a loan, but by buying stock in the airlines, at the lowest price at which the stock has traded in the past three months. For example, United stock hit a low of $21.28. If the aid to United is set at $2.128 billion, then the government will buy 100,000,000 shares of United stock at $21.28/share.

2. The airline may buy the government's stock back at cost plus 6%/year simple interest, any time in the next 5 years, if the airline has made an operating profit for 4 successive quarters and if the airline is not borrowing money to buy the stock back. I envision that the airlines that survive the depression will buy the government's stock back, a few shares at a time.

3. All existing stock option grants to management and the board of directors will expire 60 days from the date of the aid. The option owners may exercise them within the next 60 days, or not at all. The airline may not reprice them to allow the executives to exercise the options at today's price instead of the price at which they were granted. This effectively makes the stock options worthless, which is the idea - since the senior managers and directors participated in the company's bad decisions, they should not profit from the bailout.

4. The airline will not issue any new stock options, repurchase any private shares, or pay any dividend until it has purchased all of the government's shares.

5. Executive compensation is capped at $750,000/year, or in the alternative at 30 times the salary of the lowest-paid full-time employee as of March 1, 2020.

I accept the industry's argument that it is something in the nature of a public utility, an essential service for American business and consumers. In recognition of the claims of its managers that it provides a public service, the Laquedem Airline Relief Plan also has two operational requirements. One is to provide better service to communities and the other is to improve the passenger experience in the air:

6. The federal government will require each recipient airline to provide daily passenger jet service to at least one community that had daily passenger jet service at any time since 1986 and that has since lost its jet service. I picked 1986 because that's when the federal government deregulated the industry and stopped ensuring that communities that needed air passenger service would receive it. The principle is the same as the one that gives electric power companies exclusive territory in exchange for their promise to serve everyone within the territory.

7. Within one year after receiving federal aid, each recipient airline will refit its coach sections to have at least 34 inches of seat pitch. (Seat pitch is not the same as legroom. It is the distance between a point in one row of seats and the same point in the next row of seats.) The sale of any seat with less than 34 inches of seat pitch will be prohibited after a certain date. If we taxpayers are going to save the airline industry we should require the lucky beneficiaries to improve the quality of the product. There's no reason for coach travel to be comfortable only for people of the stature of Martin van Buren.

Let's use the airlines' need not just to make them improve their financial management but also to make them offer a better product.

March 22, 2020 at 11:16 AM in Business, COVID-19, Current Affairs, 老王2.2.3 | Permalink | Comments (0)

The Laquedem coronavirus relief plan, Part 1: Student loans

This post is the first in a series to describe policy initiatives to help the United States economy recover from the depression that the COVID-19 pandemic has caused. Based on the slow national response to the pandemic and the growing wave of stay-home and shelter-in-place orders, I sadly expect it to be a long series.

The Republican leadership in Congress (there is none in the executive branch at the moment) is supporting some relief for consumers and a lot of relief for large businesses. "The devil is in the details," as the saying goes, and Congress is going to be occupied for some time in negotiating the details of any business bailout.

Any relief program should start by providing some help to many people, instead of a lot of help to very few people. I propose that Congress start with a simple step that requires little administration and provides debt and expense relief to 45 million Americans. The step is to pay off the $1.6 trillion of student loans that those 45 million Americans owe to public and private lenders. Some of those 45 million borrowers are in deferment; many of them are making monthly payments, often from the earnings of jobs that don't now exist. Paying off the student loans has two immediate effects: first, the borrowers who are making payments will have more disposable income when conditions return to normal; second, the lenders that are now holding the loans will have $1.6 trillion of liquidity that they can redirect to more productive uses. They might, for example, use the cash to make masks and toilet paper.

The Laquedem Student Loan Payment Plan will come with three conditions, each of which Congress can mandate. The first condition is that the borrowers will not report the repayment as 老王永久免费佛系加速器在线下载V2.2.16 - 沃的资源网:2021-6-7 · 老王永久免费佛系加速器在线下载V2.2.16 内容相关软件名称：老王软件大小：37.2MB 软件版本：2.2.15→2.2.16 软件语言：简体中文软件类型：国产软件软件授权：共享软件更新时间：2021-06-07 23:16:38 应用平台：安卓. Lenders will not issue 1099-C forms to the students. The repayment will be treated as if Grandma had paid tuition directly to the schools, which under current tax law is neither a taxable gift from Grandma nor taxable income to the student. The second condition is that the government will neither make nor guarantee student loans for tuition at any proprietary (for-profit) school. The third condition is to again make student loans cancellable in bankruptcy.

The reasons for the three conditions are simple. The first condition ensures that students whose loans are paid off don't incur a tax liability for which they aren't receiving cash with which to pay it. The second condition recognizes that the default rate on loans to students to attend for-profit schools is far higher than on loans to students who attend public and private non-profit colleges. In 2016, the latest year for which I can find statistics, the default rate on loans for private college tuition was 6.6%, the default rate on loans for public college tuition was 9.6%, and the default rate on loans for tuition at for-profit schools was 15.2%. The default rates for public and private non-profit schools were heavily skewed upward by defaults on loans for students who attended for less than four years.

The third condition corrects one of the missteps of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, which made student loans mostly nondischargeable in bankruptcy. We should not expect 18-year-old borrowers to be smarter than the large and sophisticated banks that make the loans.

百度非遗公益:2021-8-5 · “百度shǒu艺人”案例展示 “百度shǒu艺人“计划已为贵州苗绣、陕西华县皮影、熊氏珐琅、老北京兔儿爷、金氏风筝等多个非遗老手艺免费上线信息流公益广告，在喜爱传统文化、老手艺的精准人群中投放，一周内分别获得20w-50w不等的曝光。

My next post on the topic will synthesize ideas for rescuing the domestic airline industry.

March 22, 2020 at 09:59 AM in COVID-19, Current Affairs, Health Care, National Politics | Permalink | Comments (0)

March 08, 2020

Sweet Sixteen

Sixteen years ago yesterday I wrote my first blog post, opining on the then-hot controversy about the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals wanting to cut a hole in the foundation of the Pioneer Courthouse for access to secure parking. Since then the driveway onto the transit mall has become part of the background. I surmise that most of the pedestrians who walk by each day have forgotten the fight, or think of it as "just a few years ago." It really was sixteen years ago, as you can tell by the politicos whom I named: Commissioner Francesconi and Congressman Wu.

The blogging world has changed since 2004. Many of the blogs I followed then have fallen silent, often to disappear from the web altogether. Much of the sophisticated political discussion, and some of the mindless political invective, no longer appears on independent pages of opinion; now it's on Facebook. (How can you trim your Christmas card mailing list instantly? Post something political on Facebook.)

I plan to continue blogging for some years to come, even though I've acknowledged the reality of Facebook (probably how you came across this post), and to stick to four principles:

- - Attack problems with logic, and ensure that percentages add up to 100.
  - Meld unrelated ideas into solutions (something like recombinant DNA), particularly with the Laquedem Plans to Improve the Universe.
  - Tell the stories of the Portland and the 老王灯笼APP of yesteryear.
  - However much I may savage the policies of an elected official (and I sometimes do), I will be polite in referring to the official. It takes a lot of courage - maybe foolhardiness - to run for elective office. Here the incumbent president will be "the president," or "President Trump," or "Mr. Trump," or on repeated reference "Trump," and not a nickname. Besides, it's more fun to make a point with a stiletto than with a bludgeon.

(photo credit: Barbara A. Campagna, FAIA. Used with permission.)

March 08, 2020 at 02:52 PM in 老王免费灯笼2.2.4, Philosophy, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (0)

老王灯笼官方下载

佛跳墙app最新版-佛跳墙app安卓免费版下载v1.2-领航下载站:2021-6-12 · 领航下载站提供佛跳墙app安卓免费版免费下载,佛跳墙是一款跟老王的灯笼差不多的软件，现在国内已经限速，很多都已经上不去，这款取消您的梯子软件希望可以帮到你们，同样都是免费使用，喜欢的话欢迎下载体验哦！（截图仅供参考，不是软件本身截图）佛跳墙怎么使用教程 1、下载安装佛 ...

A great number of creative and energetic Democrats put themselves forward as candidates for the nomination to run against Donald Trump. Some advocated for the interests of the overlooked middle class. Others supported redirecting part of our bloated defense budget to improve the lives of Americans. One promised to outspend the coming Republican campaign. Yet the party appears to be headed toward nominating the antithesis of creativity and energy: Joe Biden, the longest-serving politician in the race and second-oldest of the initial slate of candidates, younger only than Senator Sanders. (How old is Vice President Biden? If he is elected and takes office in 2021 he will be 77 days older than Ronald Reagan was on the day that Reagan retired.)

Why, then, has the party so thoroughly rejected innovation and retreated toward Joe Biden? Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., who died on this day 85 years ago, offers one explanation: "Most of the things we do, we do for no better reason than that our fathers have done them or our neighbors do them, and the same is true of a larger part than what we suspect of what we think. " John Maynard Keynes proposes a more academic reason by analogy to a newspaper's contest in which the readers are asked to choose the six most attractive faces from a field of 100. Persons who choose the six faces that attract the most votes will win a prize.

Many entrants, he said, will choose the six faces that they find most attractive. Cleverer entrants, he posited, will disregard their own standards of beauty and choose the six faces that they think the other entrants will like best. Even more ingenious entrants will choose not the six faces that they like the best, nor the six faces that they think the general public will prefer, but the six faces that they think the general public will believe that the general public will prefer . . . and so on ad infinitum. The Democratic primary is now a Keynesian beauty contest - the pundits are urging Democratic voters to support, not the candidate that they best like, but the candidate whom they believe the Republicans will least dislike.

March 06, 2020 at 08:39 AM in 45, National Politics | Permalink | 老王 2.2.8

有什么能用的V P N

Occasional comments about business and politics in Portland, Oregon, mixed in with stories from our city's colorful if not always compliant past, retold by the world's 142nd foremost authority.